However, given the unstable situation around the Covid-19 pandemic and the production itself, it is possible that the film adaptation may still postpone. If a pause taken in mid-March was not extended due to coronavirus, then the shooting Uncharted should have recently launched in Berlin.
The story of the young Neutan Drake directs Ruben Flaher (Ruben Fleischer; "Venom"). The main character plays Tom Holland (Tom Holland), and his mentor Sally – Mark Walberg (Mark Wahlberg).
Recall that until May 6 Sony Gives a collection “Uncharted: Nathan Drake. Collection", which includes the first three parts of the series. The Japanese company also gives the adventure Journey.
April 25, 2020 as a Mirror’s edge, only in VR-the gameplay of the parkour-wrestler Stride
April 25, 2020 in the DOOM Eternal soundtrack spectrograms are also hidden several Easter lines
Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune
Uncharted 2: Among Thieves
UNCHARTED 3: Drake’s Depation
UNCHARTED 4: A Thief’s End
The best comments
And you will put the gentlemen on a par with some list of Schindler, for example? Or shooting from a show? Or running around the blade?
For different genres, different criteria. A good comedy according to its criteria will never be equal to a good horror. It makes no sense to compare a stranger with a naked gun. At the same time, both are quite good films.
A good film is the film that works well as part of your genre. Trying to shove a good militant and a good family drama into one row – a perversion. There is simply nothing to compare there.
And what is in your understanding "Good movie"? Zombieland-quite acceptable chernukha with normal (for its genre) humor and some kind of plot.
Very simple – a good movie that can be put on a par with other good films. Put the zombieland on a par with gentlemen, for example?
No, I won’t put it, nodepositbonuscasinos.co.uk/ because I did not watch gentlemen and I don’t know at all what we are talking about. I gave as an example exactly one film that I did not watch, and probably many others did not watch. So -so sample.
For example, I really liked the film not a very typical film about the first contact with the extraterrestrial mind. Without a fucking American colonel represented by the main villain, and without a cliche about high ranks who have troubles with a head typical of all films about aliens. For the whole film – one explosion, and he is perceived as a tragedy, and not as a fireworks at the day of independence. I will also not put him on a par with a zombie, t.To. These are just different genres, the goal of these genres is different, the atmosphere, the message in films is everything else. I will not compare the philosophical film about the wisdom of the extraterrestrial mind and the fragmentation of mankind with the film, in which there is a section "Zombie-killer of the year".
I can’t say anything about the jerkid from the anniversary, I use the jerks of another supplier: D
Let’s objectively, the plots of games rarely correspond to the quality necessary for good cinema, there is still a huge work on the part of the script. And I still am more impressed by some expansion of the universe, what kind of interest to look at the same? AC could have such an extension, but in fact some kind of stump is incomprehensible.
Although in this sense, it is curious what will happen to the film adaptation if they really decided to shoot clearly in the game. On the one hand, the playing this is not particularly needed, and comparison with original actors is inevitable, but will there be at least a normal story for a third -party viewer.
Why at all to film what looks like a film. Write down the passage, make a game of it and there will be a norm. This can be done in the top while sitting on quarantine. But no, you need to jer for the year to cut the gag for a hundred -tiercomiles, in which with the original there will be a common name.
Now all these transfers of the release dates that all news feeds are full of, it is just like we are transferring vacations from May to November, just to stake the graphs … Not only do we still need to live, no one knows what will be there for the situation even around the country, not to mention the world. At the moment, even nobody is able to predict the production process, which is not able to predict the use of their new dates.
Obviously, then that people who are familiar with the series of games, and people who go to the cinema, are two sets that intersect only partly. And the second of them is clearly much more massive, and I want money from them also. And here, the main key points in the world have already been developed, which would not make a movie on the "finished material". The fact that in the end in the vast majority of cases from the film adaptations of the games, despondency is not interesting either the first or the second, this is another conversation. Moreover, the problem, in my opinion, is precisely that they are trying to sit on two chairs, as a result of the game audience, this is simply not interesting, because they saw the source, but mass is not clear, because they do not see the depths of the world, and the plots in such a film are usually the same. In this sense, an attempt to adapt the young years of Drake, which was not in the games, is one of the possible good options, because there will be nothing to compare with, and the story will not repeat what was already in games. And there is already a question in execution.
What is wrong? Popular actors who go to the cinema. Cover both young girls and older. Plus fans of the spider rather, they will not bypass (at least some part).
+, There is some meaning in his choice, easy filing. The main thing is that the “bosses” are not yet enlisted in the final of the production process.
I quite rarely I can cut out the time for films, so I watch 1-2 per month. And it is very important for me that it is a good movie, because I do not watch them for giving up 2 hours of time, but to get some expirence.
Well, welcome to the real world. There are people who watch more than two films a month. There are people who are ready to see something new, unknown, not 146% brilliant, in order to evaluate the quality. Moreover, there are people who are ready to spend their priceless time to Review movies! Therefore, your egocentric opinion is not only devoid of global value, but also may seem offensive to someone.
You are not a film critic, yes? Not professional, at least who devoted his life to his life and career. I’m not a film critic, but I see some contradiction in your words, especially when you give an example:
There are good, but completely unbroken horror films, and there are also pll -fingered, although frightening to the soot. Because the movie should be endowed with meaning, the idea for which the film is shot.
I cannot bind these thoughts in my head, because I have not seen a single horror (pure horror, not a thriller), which would have some kind of deep message, some kind of philosophy. So that in the end, in front of the credits, the viewer came to the viewer more complicated than “there is no need to bury a nine-year-old orphans in the forest alive”.
Or so that it is shot for the sake of the "idea", so that any person, having heard, immediately said: “Yes, your mother! Such a film simply must exist!".
If you know, give an example.
The task of the horror is to scare. If he does not cope, then this is a bad horror. Not necessarily a bad movie. It can be interesting and well done, but it was possible to write another genre in the annotation if the film does not cope with the main task in the specified genre.
Most of the films that are trying to cause not only stupid animal fear of incomprehensible or unacceptable, but at least some reasoning on the topic “Why did it happen, but how it should be, but how to fix it, and what we are people do” generally automatically turn into the genre of thrillers. They have other tasks, other techniques, and other endings.
In general, it is extremely difficult for me to understand the wording "for what reason the film was shot". The screenwriter or director must have some kind of psychological trauma or an intimate story that pushed to shoot a particular film?
The film cannot be shot simply because some director seemed interesting and cool the idea to film some proposed script? Maybe in society there is a high demand for a certain genre (hello, “transformers”, “avengers” and others like them).
For what reason good films were shot? For what reason was the "alien" was removed? "Arrival"? For what reason Tarantino is making his films? What are still good … "28 days later" for what reason was removed? The film, which many consider classic in the genre of “horrors” and a frying “zombie apocalypse”, although in fact the plot is completely SP ** wives from the book of 1966, only predatory plants suddenly became zombies.
I’ve been in the cinema for 3 years only to thump and for me every time it is happiness. I got a lot of pleasure from Lara Croft, and from the Black Panther, and from the zombie.
No offense, but I sincerely do not understand a person who cannot enjoy the films in a sober state if they are not “masterpieces” according to his inner compass. Then you can only hope for the release of something similar in terms of the level of execution by the “geisha memoirs”, I believe, but this appears rarely.
In general, I saw a lot of complaints about "elitarism" in your post, sir. You must have good reasons to consider yourself and your taste better than thousands of others, but they were not described here. And with such a limited time to watch films, I am not entirely clear what you are doing on the game site, because the games by the time are even more demanding! Rade Shadou Ladgends in general, we left the original discussion. Ancharted. An adventure film, the idea of which is never new. The best that he can count on is a comparison with the 1st or 2nd “mummy”, or with the “treasures of the nation”. It will be a worthy fate for the film on the adventure game.
I would not say that in idiotic. The same gaming films on Sonic made by ordinary players look much better than Sonic in a movie shot by Sonya.
How many times have already tried to remove the original story in the film adaptation. And every time it was either “well, so -so, at once, look at the beer with chips” or “full fiasco brother” and refusing to remove the continuation. So it is better not to fence the gag, but to shoot already according to the finished.
A lot is better than Sonic in the cinema, but only little is capable of collecting such a cashier. Do not confuse playfuls that are interesting to a small number of entuusivasts, and mass cinema, which is trying to please everyone